Nice! Sit in a chair somewhere quiet and take in a couple of deep breaths to settle the dust and start to notice just the ‘body’, the chair, floor, rugs, furniture and walls. Without thought, all there is, is colour which thought then labels as clothes, or body, chair, wall etc (we are only looking at colour for this exercise).No dividing line can be found anywhere!!Look very carefully. Where does ‘seeing’ end and colour begin? Can a dividing line between ‘seeing’ and colour be found? Or is there just seeing/colour?
Now look carefully.
1. Can a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘body’ and the colour labelled ‘chair’ be found?
2. Is there a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘chair’ and the colour labelled ‘floor/rug’?
3. Can a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘floor/rug’ and colour labelled ‘furniturel’ be found? Is there ‘space’ between ‘floor/rug’ and the ‘furniture’ or is there just simply colour
3. Can a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘floor/rug and furniture’ and the colour labelled ‘wall’ be found? Is there ‘space’ between ‘floor/rug’, ‘furniture’ and the ‘wall’ or is there just simply colour?
What do you find?
Is there an actual dividing line between any of these “colourS” or are they just simply seamless colour which thought divides into ‘things’ and further divides in into many different colourS and labels them as pink, black, yellow, green etc?
Is there such a thing as “space” or “distance”?
Is there an actual body/you sitting in a chair, or all there is, is colour?
Yes, nice!No, there seems to at times be a temporary feeling of "I am seeing" but that is just a thought and it goes away.Can a 'see-er' ever be found in 'what is being seen' – AE colour?
Yes! Nothing thinks. Thoughts just appear without authorship or doer-ship, and people are not aware of thoughts, as 'people' is just another thought appearing without authorship or doer-ship, as the is thought “I/me”.It appears so because every single thing comes and goes all the time. AE seemingly unfolds on its own in some endless continuum. The SEE-ER can't be found, it is just a thought that comes and goes.If that is all, and no INHERENT SEE-ER found . . . would anything that is suggested as the see-er be anything other than a concept/idea/thought?
Seeing and knowing are one and the same. Seeing of colour and seeing of seeing are one and the same = colour.Is the ‘see-er’ of the seen actually separate from the seen, or is it all a singular experience?No, the witness is never found anywhere, what is simply is. The experience is just one thing and all its differences are just thoughts.Is there anything that is witnessing colour?
It is a single experience, seeing cannot occur without color and color cannot appear without being seen. That does not mean there has to be a see-er. A see-er cannot be found anywhere.
Beautiful, Eric…exactly! And since there is no separation, then how can anything be hidden or unknown? Are there separate objects to be known? Or is the ‘show’ self-aware? Does knowingknown/experience itself need taste, for example to know itself, or sound, or colour to know itself.Unknown and hidden are dependent dependant on the existence of a knower and a seeker. No knower and seeker can be found so nothing can be unknown or hidden without something to know it or hide from it.Is there not a knowing of everything that is happening/appearing from moment to moment? Even the knowing of the appearance of the story of colour being a world? Is there not a knowing of/as “all the random thoughts that come and go” and of every ‘thing’ else that appears from moment to moment. Can anything be unknown or hidden?
Kay


