I can't find any outside or inside. The seeing is just that. Seeing.Where does seeing take place? Outside or inside?
There is no border. It cannot be.Where is the border between outside and inside?
I have a grapefruit in front of me. In "reality" I only see the 2D picture.Does seeing look more like 2D or 3D, if you only actually see and think nothing?
No, only the color is seen.Look closely: do you actually see an "apple" apart from a color?
I don't know the name of the color. The word "orange" (as a color for grapefruit) is known:) It is perceived as a thought by itself. There is no choice about not knowing the color in this case.How do you know the name of the color? Notice how thoughts call what is seen.
Again - I don't know the name. It is just known without any effort. The thought of grapefruit is perceived:DHow do you know the name of the apple?
No, when I look at the object it is just seeing. In the DE of seeing there is just the seeing. The knowledge of "this is grapefruit" comes later. So I would say first there is just the seeing and later a thought of "grapefruit" is perceived.Does what you see have a name when you see it or is there just seeing something? Notice the gap between seeing and labeling.
(I am spending more time on this question..somehow "I" cannot grasp it).
No distinction. It is just the seeing. It is one thing.Is there someone who sees and the seen, or is there just seeing?
This makes me smile:) There is no entity that is perceiving. It is just happening.Is there an "entity" that perceives a perceived object or is there simply perceiving?
There is no task. Only the labelling takes place. No other ideas come to "me" of what other use the thoughts can have. There is the DE of sensing which seems to be full in itself. The label comes afterwards.What is the task of thoughts in this whole process of perception?
No, I don't think the experience. It is just happening - experiencing.Do you think the experience or is there only experiencing?
I had a challenging time on this question
I said earlier "I" couldn't grasp it but "I" tried to just let it go and see what will happen. Saying this I can see also that there was no choice about this "letting go and see what will happen". It is all just happening on its own. There was no choice to perceive this question as more or less challenging and there was no choice about "letting it go". All the thoughts and thinking just evolved and was perceived without no one controlling it. It is really all just the perception of all the process in this case.Does what you see have a name when you see it or is there just seeing something? Notice the gap between seeing and labeling.
It is all just as it is:)