If by inside you mean made up of thought, yes.So the matrix is really inside?
So, have you looked?Ahh..no wonder we don't wanna look.
Who is there to receive?I seem to receive and transmit only.
In experience, is there an experiencer? Is someone having the experience? Is life happening to someone or something, or is the experiencer a thought that happens within the unfolding of life, as you call it?But only as an experiencer not as a doer.
Without thought that draws me I am not there.
Ok. Now, danny, this isn't something that you make true through quieting the mind and intensely focusing on it. The void that you've seen in the place where the self was considered to have been, has always been there and will always be there. Can you see that?Erm....the bad news is that the moment doesn't seem to last long.LOL
Yes that can be seen now.Is it true that there has never been and will never be a you?
Can you describe what identification is? How it works?Once I get that identification out of the way,I stay in the void easily.
Who is there to be anything? What does it mean to ask "Who am I?"?Erm....now to the unanswerable...what the hell am I?
A thought that identifies with a singularity.Can you describe what identification is? How it works?
Who will stay in the void? What does that mean?
Notice I didn't ask WHO am IWho is there to be anything? What does it mean to ask "Who am I?"?
I become that which I see once I get out of the way.
The question remains the same.Notice I didn't ask WHO am I
but WHAT am I.
How does that work? How does a thought identify with a singularity?A thought that identifies with a singularity.
I have no idea what you mean by "the void of no thought". Does that void depend on there being no thoughts?Staying in the void of no thought.
This I we need to identify- what/where/how is it?So If I focus on trying to stay there,thought will continue to blur/delude.
Once Iget that identification out of the way,I stay in the void easily.
Erm....now to the unanswerable...what the hell am I?
Oops then if there's no "what" either..I'm lost and have no clue what you're talking about.What I is there to be anything?
In the void I was in,and thought that it was the no-self,when I was absent of thought life just happened without there being a singularity.This I we need to identify- what/where/how is it?
There is no such thing as the "no-self". We're not looking to find the no-self, create a no-self of get closer to a no-self. There is no no-self! ;-) Forget about the no-self for a moment and look at what is ALWAYS already the case. Does a self ever occur, at any moment, in any way?In the void I was in,and thought that it was the no-self
Do thoughts require you to occur?when I was absent of thought life just happened without there being a singularity.
Does 'I' ever refer to anything else than language? In even the most mundane of sentences?At other times,I just use 'I' as I would think it corresponds to the structuring of a sentence.
Sure.Is there anything called No-you-for-Dummies 101?
I need something more basic.
The I in that sentence for example. Break it down, the experience of feeling lost. Where, in that experience, is the I?Quite frankly,I feel lost.
You're on the right track there, Danny- keep looking at it like this, exactly like this.There is space and happenings.
The walking,typing,and thinking happen as events.
They pass through me because I'm not there.
Where they come from is a mystery.
If I take myself out of the equation....wait.
Yes! It's always been like this. There was just confusion.A feeling of remembrance.
In a way, yes. Naked perception, raw, direct.Searching for words.
It's like...returning to childhood or babyhood.
Was there ever an I isolated from life, labelling things?Labels by the I disappear as The I is no longer isolated from life.
Yes, labelling happens- no labeler.But life itself?
There is still labelling but not a laberer?
There is seeing but not a seer.
The doing just...takes place.
Thought non-isolated by any particular thinker or center.
Just thought that flows here and there.
Very well said.And then anger is felt.
Where did the cover-ups come from?
That I bought into this self when I appeared here?
And was later told that I had been born?
The 'i" would be a construct.
Keep writing, danny, it really helps to clear things up.There can be no observer as that observer cannot look unto himself.
There would be only observing.
And even then,a falsity.
As the observing would be of labels imposed by others.
So what is being seen is nothing from nothing?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests